Our Case, In Our Words
Why Domandata Is Built for Conjoint Experiments
We make Domandata, so this is our argument, not a neutral comparison. Social-science conjoints, the kind analyzed with AMCEs and marginal means, need fully randomized profiles, a faithful record of what each respondent saw, and enough power for the levels you care about. We built our conjoint around that workflow instead of around market simulation.
What our conjoint does
When another tool is the better choice
We would rather lose a signup than have a study run on the wrong platform.
You want individual utilities, preference shares, or market simulation.
That is hierarchical Bayes territory. Sawtooth Software, Conjointly, and Qualtrics Conjoint estimate utilities and simulate shares with built-in analysis; we export data for you to model. How to choose conjoint software
You need adaptive choice-based conjoint.
Adaptive designs are a Sawtooth Software strength. We run fully randomized designs. How to choose conjoint software
You want AMCE estimates computed inside the survey tool.
We export the realized design; estimation happens in R or Stata, for example with the cjoint package. How to choose conjoint software